On Monday 11 March 2013, James Hogan wrote: > > /* > > * Version flags for semctl, msgctl, and shmctl commands > > * These are passed as bitflags or-ed with the actual command > > */ > > #define IPC_OLD 0 /* Old version (no 32-bit UID support on many > > architectures) */ > > #define IPC_64 0x0100 /* New version (support 32-bit UIDs, bigger > > message sizes, etc. */ > > > > So someone with more ABI wisdom needs to suggest what is the right approach. > > Agreed. > > Note that in uClibc, 64bit arches (excl alpha/mips for some reason) were > already defining __IPC_64 as 0, so there's some precedent for it working > the way it does. Yes, there is no reason to need the distinction. If LTP is checking for IPC_OLD compatibility on anything but really old architectures, that is a bug in LTP, or possibly in the libc. Arnd -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-arch" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
