On Mon, Jan 28, 2013 at 11:59:36AM +0530, Vineet Gupta wrote: > Hi Sam, > > On Thursday 24 January 2013 04:20 PM, Vineet Gupta wrote: > > Arnd in his review pointed out that arch Kconfig organisation has several > > deficiencies: > > > > * Build time entries for things which can be runtime extracted from DT > > (e.g. SDRAM size, core clk frequency..) > > * Not multi-platform-image-build friendly (choice .. endchoice constructs) > > * cpu variants support (750/770) is exclusive. > > > > The first 2 have been fixed in subsequent patches. > > Due to the nature of the 750 and 770, it is not possible to build for > > both together, w/o special runtime glue code which would hurt > > performance. > > > > Signed-off-by: Vineet Gupta <vgupta@xxxxxxxxxxxx> > > Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@xxxxxxxx> > > Cc: Sam Ravnborg <sam@xxxxxxxxxxxx> Looks good - all former comments addressed, and nothing were jumping into my eyes now. Many existing architectures looks worse from the build stuff perspective... Acked-by: Sam Ravnborg <sam@xxxxxxxxxxxx> Sam -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-arch" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
