Hi Arnd, On Sat, Jan 26, 2013 at 12:25:09AM +0000, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > On Friday 25 January 2013, James Hogan wrote: > > Review seems to have gone quiet. I'm fairly happy with this core > > patchset in it's currently form (only trivial alterations required since > > the v3 patches, e.g. some review comments and rebasing on linus/master), > > and would like to get it into the v3.9 merge window. What's the best way > > forward? I presume I need to get acks on each individual patch? > > > I've just looked through the entire series once more and could not find > any show-stoppers. I consider this ready for 3.9, and I'm also quite happy > with Vineet's ARC port, although I think he is still integrating some > feedback comments. Thanks for taking another look over it and for all the guidance. > I'd suggest that you both ask Stephen to add the trees to linux-next > now (I thought you had done that already, but I don't see them there > at the moment). Okay. Yeh, I was holding off expecting to need more acks. > You don't need Acked-by statements on every single patch, but having > more of those is certainly benefitial. When it comes to the merge > window, please send a pull request to Linus, and keep me on Cc, > so I can weigh in with an additional Ack to the series. Okay, I'll try and get some more acks on specific patches. > Until then, maybe you can have another look at each other's architecture > trees (ARC and Meta). Since you are in exactly the same situation with > upstream integration now, you are probably the best people to review > the code, and you providing ACKs and constructive feedback to the other > tree will helps others see that you are up to the job as an arch > maintainer. I have also given a few comments to one of you that > may actually apply to the other one just as well, but I can't remember > now what I discussed with whom ;-) Good idea. I've been working on a few changes already based on ARC feedback which also applies to Meta :-) Cheers James -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-arch" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
