Hi! > >>> Ok, plus there's already computing standard called "arc". > >>> > >>> https://www.linux-mips.org/wiki/ARC > >>> > >>> What about calling the architecture "sarc" or "syarc" ? > >> I think it would be best use of everybody's time if you could focus on > >> the technical content of the port rather than the name. It has been like > >> that for +10 years and I don't intend to make the kernel port name > >> different from THE arch name itself. > > Yeah, and it is best use of reviewers time to confuse them with > > one-letter difference to very popular architecture... and use three > > letter acronym that was already taken. > > > > In this state, I hope your port never gets merged. Yes, I got used to > > do cd a<tab>/ar<tab>. > > Although I really don't want to spend time arguing with you but still ...... if > you had a neighbor with same name as your friend your strategy most likely would > be to force one of them to change names - kind of seems funny and > stupid. Yeah, imagine creating "/bin/mr" that would be du equivalent. How many people would delete their files by mistake? > Having said that, despite all the ranting so far, you've not managed to comment on > a single line of the actual code, which is more funny and stupid. So Yeah, you tricked me into reviewing your code. No, I will not do more reviews for you. Yes, I bet I'm not the only one, and I bet that mistake will happen about once per developer. Pavel -- (english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek (cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-arch" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
