On Friday 18 January 2013, Vineet Gupta wrote:
> TBD: Do we need early ioremap support like openrisc
>
> Signed-off-by: Vineet Gupta <vgupta@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Can you explain why early ioremap is necessary for you?
I wasn't aware that openrisc has it. In a lot of cases,
you can use fixmap as a replacement.
> +
> +#ifndef _ASM_ARC_IO_H
> +#define _ASM_ARC_IO_H
> +
> +#include <asm/byteorder.h>
> +#include <asm/page.h>
> +
> +extern void __iomem *ioremap(unsigned long physaddr, unsigned long size);
> +extern void iounmap(const void __iomem *addr);
> +
> +#define ioremap_nocache(phy, sz) ioremap(phy, sz)
> +#define ioremap_wc(phy, sz) ioremap(phy, sz)
> +
> +/* Change struct page to physical address */
> +#define page_to_phys(page) (page_to_pfn(page) << PAGE_SHIFT)
> +
> +#include <asm-generic/io.h>
I think I commented before that asm-generic/io.h has a number of
problems and you should at least override the __raw_{read,write}{b,w,l,q}
functions with your own ones using inline assembly.
You should also define a non-NULL PCI_IOBASE.
Arnd
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-arch" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
