Since commit 0049fb2603b7afb1080776ee691dfa5a3d282357 ("OMAPFB: use
dma_alloc_attrs to allocate memory") we have one non-arch user of
dma_{alloc,free}_attrs().
Hence provide these functions, as wrappers around
dma_{alloc,free}_coherent().
Note that most architectures do it the other way around. But as these are
dummy functions, we don't care.
Signed-off-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
include/asm-generic/dma-mapping-broken.h | 16 ++++++++++++++++
1 files changed, 16 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
diff --git a/include/asm-generic/dma-mapping-broken.h b/include/asm-generic/dma-mapping-broken.h
index ccf7b4f..6c32af9 100644
--- a/include/asm-generic/dma-mapping-broken.h
+++ b/include/asm-generic/dma-mapping-broken.h
@@ -16,6 +16,22 @@ extern void
dma_free_coherent(struct device *dev, size_t size, void *cpu_addr,
dma_addr_t dma_handle);
+static inline void *dma_alloc_attrs(struct device *dev, size_t size,
+ dma_addr_t *dma_handle, gfp_t flag,
+ struct dma_attrs *attrs)
+{
+ /* attrs is not supported and ignored */
+ return dma_alloc_coherent(dev, size, dma_handle, flag);
+}
+
+static inline void dma_free_attrs(struct device *dev, size_t size,
+ void *cpu_addr, dma_addr_t dma_handle,
+ struct dma_attrs *attrs)
+{
+ /* attrs is not supported and ignored */
+ dma_free_coherent(dev, size, cpu_addr, dma_handle);
+}
+
#define dma_alloc_noncoherent(d, s, h, f) dma_alloc_coherent(d, s, h, f)
#define dma_free_noncoherent(d, s, v, h) dma_free_coherent(d, s, v, h)
--
1.7.0.4
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-arch" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
