Re: Sharing PCIE driver between Microblaze and Arm zynq

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, 6 Dec 2012 15:23:14 +0100, Michal Simek <michal.simek@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Hi guys,
> 
> I have a question regarding to sharing generic OF pcie driver between
> two architectures MB and ARM Zynq.
> Is drivers/pci/pcie location good for it?
> Make no sense to have the same driver in two locations.
> Is using readl/writel IO functions in this driver the best option
> which we can have?
> Or is there any other recommendation?
> 
> Also just want to check if it is correct to use pcie device_type.
> The rest should be the same with pci description:
> (http://devicetree.org/MPC5200:PCI#PCI_Address_Translation).

Yes. device_type may be deprecated, but the PCI binding predates that.
PowerPC uses pcie in the device type. arch/powerpc/kernel/of_platform.c

Some of that powerpc DT PCI support code really should be made generic.

g.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-arch" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel]     [Kernel Newbies]     [x86 Platform Driver]     [Netdev]     [Linux Wireless]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux Filesystems]     [Yosemite Discussion]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux