On Sat, 2012-10-13 at 11:17 +0100, Catalin Marinas wrote: > Hi Steven, > > On 13 October 2012 03:26, Steven Rostedt <rostedt@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Recently I suggested to someone that was adding a new asm file that > > currently only contained an x86 change to add a header in all archs > > that was just a wrapper to point to the asm-generic version. I suggested > > this because that's the way we use to do it and just to refresh my > > memory, I looked at div64.h in a few archs and saw that was the case. > > > > After having the change done and just after finishing testing it, I was > > notified that the "proper" way of doing this is to add it to the > > > > arch/*/include/asm/Kbuild > > > > file, as 'generic-y += foo.h' and it will reference the asm-generic > > file automatically. Well it would have been nice if I knew this before > > and wasn't confused by seeing the incorrect method. > > Since you are cleaning this up already, could you please merge these > patches into your series: > > https://lkml.org/lkml/2012/10/11/291 > > The first patch adds support for generic-y in the new > arch/*/include/uapi/asm/Kbuild file, followed by few patches to > convert three architectures. There will probably be more to convert > after -rc1. If the maintainers don't, I'll be happy to take them in too. I can set up a separate branch for this. I'll see what I can do next week, although I'll be traveling for the RTLWS. -- Steve -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-arch" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html