Re: [PATCH 0/3] Virtual huge zero page

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 10/01/2012 10:36 AM, Kirill A. Shutemov wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 01, 2012 at 10:33:12AM -0700, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
>> Overall, I'm okay with either as long as we don't lock down 2 MB when
>> there isn't a huge zero page in use.
> 
> Is shinker-reclaimable huge zero page okay for you?
> 

Yes, I'm fine with that.  However, I'm curious about the relative
benefit versus virtual hzp from a performance perspective, on an
application where hzp actually matters.

One can otherwise argue that if hzp doesn't matter for except in a small
number of cases that we shouldn't use it at all.

	-hpa


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-arch" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel]     [Kernel Newbies]     [x86 Platform Driver]     [Netdev]     [Linux Wireless]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux Filesystems]     [Yosemite Discussion]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux