On Thu, 23 Aug 2012, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> > > > +asmlinkage int compat_sys_personality(compat_ulong_t personality)
> > > > +{
> > > > + int ret;
> > > > +
> > > > + if (personality(current->personality) == PER_LINUX32 &&
> > > > + personality == PER_LINUX)
> > > > + personality = PER_LINUX32;
> > > > + ret = sys_personality(personality);
> > > > + if (ret == PER_LINUX32)
> > > > + ret = PER_LINUX;
> > > > + return ret;
> > > > +}
> > >
> > > Where did you get this from?
> > >
> > > You should not need compat_sys_personality, just call the native function.
> >
> > Hmm, but in that case an aarch32 application doing a personality(PER_LINUX)
> > syscall will start seeing the wrong uname.
>
> Coming back at this topic, I noticed another issue. Jiri Kosina
> has recently posted patches to fix this function in the other architectures
Yeah, there were quite a few broken ones, some of them since the beginning
of time.
> in order to mask out the other personality bits, which is a correct fix,
> but the above function is odd for other reasons.
>
> * On MIPS, it is used only for compat tasks, like you have it above.
> * On PA-RISC, it is used for native 32 bit tasks and for compat 32 bit tasks,
> but not for native 64 bit ones.
> * On IA64, it was used for compat tasks (support for which has since
> been removed from the kernel), plus all 32 bit tasks would start with
> PER_LINUX32.
> * On PowerPC, Sparc and s390, it is used for native 64 bit tasks and for
> compat 32 bit tasks, but not for native 32 bit ones.
> * On Tile, it was never used.
> * On x86_64, it used to be defined (copied from ia64) but not used
> throughout the git history.
>
> The semantics of the function are also interesting: The intention seems
> to be that to a compat task, PER_LINUX32 would appear as PER_LINUX.
> The effect is that any process can set PER_LINUX32 but it can never
> be unset except by a 64 bit MIPS or PA-RISC task.
>
> Since x86_64 does not implement this behavior at all, I suspect that
> there are now lots of things depending on not having it, while all
> the other architectures might also have some (even predating the
> x86_64 port) use cases that depend on depend on not being able to
> observe PER_LINUX32 in 32 bit compat tasks.
>
> I think we should try to agree on how this is all supposed to work
> and use common code, either put the ppc/sparc/s390 version into
> sys_personality, or remove all of them and just do what x86 and tile
> do, using the regular sys_personality for all tasks.
How about rather introducing common compat_sys_personality() and switching
the archs that are using it to it? Unifying the behavior (PER_LINUX /
PER_LINUX32 masquerading) should be painless.
Thanks,
--
Jiri Kosina
SUSE Labs
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-arch" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
