On 15 August 2012 20:03, Olof Johansson <olof@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Wed, Aug 15, 2012 at 06:37:11PM +0100, Catalin Marinas wrote: >> If we add machine_desc structure back, we could print which machine was >> matched. But so far I try to keep the SoC code to a minimum and just do >> the probing later in the SoC code (of_find_matching_node). Ideally we >> shouldn't have any SoC code and just keep code in drivers but we'll see >> how far we can get. We can discuss more details at the KS as I would >> like the arm-soc team to get involved here. > > Interesting approach, I wonder if it'll scale, in particular if it comes > to needing to do early setup and init. For device-level setup, generic > will probably work just fine. And if it doesn't, things can be changed > later. So it sounds like a good start. > > Definitely something we should discuss. I suggest not doing it at KS > though, since only half of the arm-soc team is invited there. So the > ARM mini-summit or hallway around LPC is a better venue. I was indeed thinking of the ARM mini-summit or hallway discussions. The KS has different topics and it wouldn't have been of wide interest anyway. -- Catalin -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-arch" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
