Re: [PATCH] sched/numa: fix compat declarations for sys_numa_{t,m}bind()

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tuesday 12 June 2012, Chris Metcalf wrote:
> The asm-generic code needs actual declarations of the routines,
> and the syscall entries need to reference the correct names.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Chris Metcalf <cmetcalf@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> The tilegx architecture is currently broken in linux-next because
> of this issue.

Acked-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@xxxxxxxx>

Please apply to the branch that contains the syscall implementation.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-arch" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel]     [Kernel Newbies]     [x86 Platform Driver]     [Netdev]     [Linux Wireless]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux Filesystems]     [Yosemite Discussion]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux