On Sun, Jun 10, 2012 at 06:33:10PM -0300, Ezequiel Garcia wrote: > On Sat, Jun 9, 2012 at 6:14 AM, Paul Mundt <lethal@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Sat, Jun 09, 2012 at 05:13:26AM -0300, Ezequiel Garcia wrote: > >> This patch removes the following warning: > >> fs/binfmt_flat.c:752: warning: unused variable ???persistent??? > >> There is neither change in functionality, nor extra code generated. > >> > >> Cc: Paul Mundt <lethal@xxxxxxxxxxxx> > >> Cc: <linux-sh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > >> Signed-off-by: Ezequiel Garcia <elezegarcia@xxxxxxxxx> > > > > That's what the cast was for, with what gcc version did that stop > > working? > > I just realized that I should send a v2 (not the whole series just this one) > correcting the commit message, since there wasn't a warning to fix > in first place. > > I'll do this soon. If there's no warning then the point of the patch eludes me. There's nothing wrong with consistency, but attempting to fix that which isn't broken in the name of consistency borders a bit too closely on pointless busy work for my liking. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-arch" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
