On Sat, May 26, 2012 at 11:39:10AM -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote: > Further testing would be good, but I feel pretty comfy about it. It > looks fine, and when I once tried to boot a kernel with a broken > strnlen (due to incorrect byte-endian-testing, not actually incorrect > code otherwise), it didn't get very far at all. So this is actually > code that gets a fair amount of coverage testing from not even doing > anything special. Apart from a thinko in the aligned_byte_mask definition (it's wrong for 32-bit big-endian), it looks fine. You're right about it not getting very far at all; my 32-bit powerbook couldn't even mount root. I have sent a patch for that and one to use this stuff on powerpc - without Ben's ack since he is off sick at the moment. Paul. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-arch" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
