On Sat, May 26, 2012 at 12:04:29AM +0200, Richard Weinberger wrote:
> get_signal_to_deliver() already calls try_to_freeze(), there is no
> need to call it directly.
NAK. Please check linux-next (okay, viro's patches haven't appeared
there yet) but a lot of this stuff is covered by a truckload of work
that Al's done.
Please don't work across Al.
commit d9be5ea6f9b6a51535ccdd9881ffb3be2dbd48e9
Author: Al Viro <viro@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri Apr 27 01:18:52 2012 -0400
arm: don't call try_to_freeze() from do_signal()
get_signal_to_deliver() will handle it itself
Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
diff --git a/arch/arm/kernel/signal.c b/arch/arm/kernel/signal.c
index a6c4e78..3b37c14 100644
--- a/arch/arm/kernel/signal.c
+++ b/arch/arm/kernel/signal.c
@@ -642,9 +642,6 @@ static void do_signal(struct pt_regs *regs, int syscall)
}
}
- if (try_to_freeze())
- goto no_signal;
-
/*
* Get the signal to deliver. When running under ptrace, at this
* point the debugger may change all our registers ...
@@ -684,7 +681,6 @@ static void do_signal(struct pt_regs *regs, int syscall)
return;
}
- no_signal:
if (syscall) {
/*
* Handle restarting a different system call. As above,
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-arch" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
