On 05/17/2012 05:19 PM, Mike Frysinger wrote: > On Thursday 17 May 2012 18:13:26 H.J. Lu wrote: >> From: H.J. Lu <hjl.tools@xxxxxxxxx> >> >> This patch set changes a number of places where the kernel >> headers are exported to user space and currently use explicit >> "long" or "unsigned long" to use __kernel_[u]long_t in order to >> be compatible with the x32 user space ABI. These location are >> places where x32 uses the x86-64 ABI. >> >> It is quite possible that some, or even all, of these locations >> should really use dedicated types, but in the meantime this gives >> the correct results which the current headers do not. > > tangentially related, but what happened to the x86 asm/ptrace.h > patch i sent that changed all the registers from unsigned long to > u64 ? e.g. struct pt_regs { - unsigned long r15; + __u64 r15; > -mike Link please? -hpa -- H. Peter Anvin, Intel Open Source Technology Center I work for Intel. I don't speak on their behalf. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-arch" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html