On 05/17/2012 03:50 PM, Linus Torvalds wrote: > Yes, I do think this is closer to the "__u32" kind of usage, and in > general I tend to think that's true of most of the __kernel_ prefix > things. There is very little "kernely" things about it. The only think "kernely" about it is that it describes the kernel ABI. > Yes, we have to have the double underscore (or single+capitalized), > but I think that at least personally, I'd be happier with just > "__long" and "__ulong". I would suggest __slong and __ulong then, to keep with the __[su]* namespace, or does the extra "s" look too much like crap? -hpa -- H. Peter Anvin, Intel Open Source Technology Center I work for Intel. I don't speak on their behalf. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-arch" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
