On Wed, May 09, 2012 at 06:18:34PM +0200, Sam Ravnborg wrote: > On Wed, May 09, 2012 at 12:07:08PM +0400, Vladimir Murzin wrote: > > On Tue, May 08, 2012 at 06:27:22PM +0200, Sam Ravnborg wrote: > > > On Tue, May 08, 2012 at 06:40:19PM +0400, Vladimir Murzin wrote: > > > > Move check for TASK_SIZE before MAP_FIXED in sparc32's arch_get_unmapped_area(). > > > > > > I would be good to copy relevant parts of your cover letter into each patch. > > > when the patches are applied we looses the cover letter... > > > > > > > In my opinion patches are quite trivial and self-explained. However, > > if there are requests to update patches in this way I'll do it in v2. > > The cahngelog say this: > > Move check for TASK_SIZE before MAP_FIXED in sparc32's arch_get_unmapped_area(). > > And this is exactly what the code does. > > But neither say anything WHY this is done. > And if that WHY is not explained then the changelog is not good. > > Sam Ok. I'll update patches in v2. Best wishes Vladimir Murzin -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-arch" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
