(4/30/12 4:16 PM), Thomas Gleixner wrote: > Same code. Use the generic version. > > Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner<tglx@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Cc: Chen Liqin<liqin.chen@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > --- > arch/score/Kconfig | 1 + > arch/score/kernel/Makefile | 2 +- > 2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > > Index: tip/arch/score/Kconfig > =================================================================== > --- tip.orig/arch/score/Kconfig > +++ tip/arch/score/Kconfig > @@ -9,6 +9,7 @@ config SCORE > select HAVE_MEMBLOCK_NODE_MAP > select ARCH_DISCARD_MEMBLOCK > select GENERIC_CPU_DEVICES > + select HAVE_GENERIC_INIT_TASK > > choice > prompt "System type" > Index: tip/arch/score/kernel/Makefile > =================================================================== > --- tip.orig/arch/score/kernel/Makefile > +++ tip/arch/score/kernel/Makefile > @@ -4,7 +4,7 @@ > > extra-y := head.o vmlinux.lds > > -obj-y += entry.o init_task.o irq.o process.o ptrace.o \ > +obj-y += entry.o irq.o process.o ptrace.o \ > setup.o signal.o sys_score.o time.o traps.o \ > sys_call_table.o Almost patches delete arch specific init-task. But this patch doesn't. Is this really intentional? -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-arch" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
