On 24/02/12 15:09, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > On Friday 24 February 2012, James Hogan wrote: >> I've been looking at your initial comments for other architecture >> submissions and they've been very helpful, but if you do have any >> arch/metag specific suggestions I'd certainly welcome them. > > I've had only a brief look. In general I recommend doing whatever > openrisc does, they are currently the best implementation we have. Okay, thanks for the tip. > In order to get the code merged, you will need to move probing > of on-chip buses to device trees rather than hardcoding the > platform devices, that is probably the largest amount of work > that is still needed unless you've done that already in a later > version. Okay, this is something I've been looking at. > Do you have a git tree or patch with the latest source code? > the only copy I could find is a 2.6.37 kernel inside of a huge > tarball. Sorry, but unfortunately that's the latest released version of the kernel and I can't publish anything more recent at the moment. Thanks James -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-arch" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
