Hi Jiri, * Jiri Kosina <jkosina@xxxxxxx> [2012-02-22 14:47:29 +0100]: > On Tue, 21 Feb 2012, Gustavo Padovan wrote: > > > > From: "H. J. Lu" <hjl.tools@xxxxxxxxx> > > > > > > Enable the Bluetooth subsystem to be used with a compat ABI with > > > 64-bit time. > > > > > > Signed-off-by: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@xxxxxxxxx> > > > Cc: Marcel Holtmann <marcel@xxxxxxxxxxxx> > > > Cc: Gustavo F. Padovan <padovan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > > Cc: David S. Miller <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > > --- > > > net/bluetooth/hci_sock.c | 3 ++- > > > 1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-) > > > > Applied, thanks. > > How much sense does it make to apply this single patch without the > previous x32 infrastructure changes? No sense, I already stepped back with this changes. That's what happens when you try to apply patches in the middle of the Brazilian Carnival. :) Gustavo -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-arch" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
