On 02/20/2012 04:12 PM, Andy Lutomirski wrote: > > Would it make sense to remove the non-__vdso-prefixed weak symbols? > AFAICT they are somewhere between useless (because the __vdso symbols > are unambiguous), confusing (has anyone not read this and said "huh?"), > and wrong (they are not interchangeable with glibc's symbols as they > return different values). > > We're stuck with them on x86-64, but x32 is new and has no > backwards-compatibility issues. > What about non-glibc? -hpa -- H. Peter Anvin, Intel Open Source Technology Center I work for Intel. I don't speak on their behalf. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-arch" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
