Re: [PATCH 20/40] mn10300: Use set_current_blocked() and block_sigmask()

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Matt Fleming <matt@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> > Can this line create a race, now that it's not protected by a lock?  It is
> > possible for current->blocked to get altered by another thread.
> 
> ->blocked can only ever be altered by current, not another thread. See
> the following comment from sigprocmask() in kernel/signal.c,

Okay, I've managed to convince myself.  Feel free to my Acked-by to the
MN10300 and FRV patches.

David
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-arch" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel]     [Kernel Newbies]     [x86 Platform Driver]     [Netdev]     [Linux Wireless]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux Filesystems]     [Yosemite Discussion]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux