David Miller wrote: > Because accept4() has been provided via the sys_socketcall() indirect > operation, for this socket system call and several others the native > direct syscalls were never added to the x86 32-bit table and probably > never will be. Hi David, Is there any reason why it was added via sys_socketcall() - isn't that just a waste of a few cycles and kernel size, compared with a direct pointer in the syscall table? I see sendmmsg() and recvmmsg() got proper syscall slots on x86 32-bit, and are in sys_socketcall() as well, which seems a bit pointless. Thanks, -- Jamie -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-arch" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
