On Sun, Jan 8, 2012 at 5:06 PM, richard -rw- weinberger <richard.weinberger@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Mon, Jan 9, 2012 at 1:18 AM, Linus Torvalds > <torvalds@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> Ok, both of the patches look sane to me, but it would really be nice >> to hear from somebody with the actual affected architectures, and get >> a tested-by. > > UML is affected: > https://lkml.org/lkml/2012/1/8/186 > > I wasted an hour finding out why it is crashing. > Instead of testing kernels I really should read more LKML. ;-) Hmm. Ben - how about that static DEFINE_PER_CPU(struct cpu, cpu_devices); approach that Richard uses in his patch, instead of the kcalloc? And clearly UM should also do that CONFIG_GENERIC_CPU_DEVICES thing with your patch. Richard - does Ben's patch work for you too if you just add "select GENERIC_CPU_DEVICES" in the UM Kconfig too (Kconfig.common, probably)? Linus -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-arch" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
