On Wed, Jan 4, 2012 at 9:00 AM, Christoph Lameter <cl@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> xadd is 3 cycles. add is one cycle.
On some uarchs. On new uarchs it can be a single cycle, I think, and
on some uarchs it will even be microcoded and/or only go in one pipe
because it has that odd behavior that it writes both to memory and a
register, and thus doesn't fit the normal fastpaths.
The point is, xadd isn't actually any faster than just doing the
regular "add and read". It's *slower*.
There really isn't ever any reason to use xadd on percpu variables.
That's my point. You claimed that there was a performance advantage.
There really isn't.
So why are you still arguing?
Linus
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-arch" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
