Re: [PATCH 0/5 V5] Avoid soft lockup message when KVM is stopped by host

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 12/15/2011 08:53 PM, Eric B Munson wrote:
> I am working on V7 to incorporate the __this_cpu_and suggestion, would you
> consider that for inclusion and we can continue discussing the need for the
> preemption notification work?  

Okay.

> I think that having a guest complain when the
> host is so loaded that the guest watchdog threads can't make any progress is
> desirable behavior, it may be the only notification that an admin gets that a
> particular host is over loaded.

It's the wrong admin, consider a cloud scenario where the host admin and
guest admin are different people.

Notification on host overload (to initiate migration, say) is a good
idea, but it would be a different mechanism.

-- 
error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-arch" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel]     [Kernel Newbies]     [x86 Platform Driver]     [Netdev]     [Linux Wireless]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux Filesystems]     [Yosemite Discussion]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux