David Howells <dhowells@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Is this part missing, or no longer needed? > > It seems to have got lost somewhere. Thanks for catching it. Actually, it doesn't seem to be necessary. The header splitter managed to cope without it and did the right thing. I think what happened was that the splitter didn't recognise the _LINUX_PATCHKEY_H_INDIRECT thing as a reinclusion guard, so it just tossed that into the UAPI header, then recognised the _LINUX_PATCHKEY_H thing as the reinclusion guard and proceeded from there. Would you prefer that I remove that from the comments or would you prefer that I leave things unchanged? David -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-arch" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
