* Tejun Heo <tj@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > (cc'ing Stephen, hi!) > > On Mon, Dec 05, 2011 at 05:31:48PM +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote: > > * Tejun Heo <tj@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > > Hello, > > > > > > This patchset was posted quite a while ago but got lost during the > > > korg disturbance and I forgot about it too. Thankfully, benh pinged > > > me about testing this patchset yesterday, so here's the refreshed > > > version. > > > > A bit scary - you should get it into linux-next i suspect - if > > that works out then we could then put it into tip:core/memblock > > if there are no objections from anyone. > > > > It's not really an x86 tree and most of the changes are > > affecting non-x86 architectures, right? > > Hmmm... this was part of the memblock updates going through > x86/memblock and unless we're gonna setup a separate tree for memblock > (I don't think that would be necessary at this point) I think it would > be better to route this x86/memblock eventually. That said, setting > up temp linux-next branch for now sounds fine to me. hpa, what do you > think? I'm fine with routing this through -tip - the branch can be tip:core/memblock as this is really not just an x86 series - but if you could pre-test all the arch impact in linux-next that would be great ... Thanks, Ingo -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-arch" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
