David Daney <ddaney.cavm@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > We thought about doing that, but without doing some complex preprocessor fu, > the GCC attribute ((error())) thing doesn't do what we want. > > It appears that if more than a single instance of the construct is used in a > compilation unit, the string emitted by the compiler for any of the violations > will be the last string encountered. Have you tried asking the gcc folks if this is likely to get fixed soon? David -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-arch" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
