[Re: [RFC/PULL 00/11] introduce export.h; reduce module.h usage] On 13/10/2011 (Thu 12:37) Rusty Russell wrote: > On Thu, 28 Jul 2011 01:16:07 -0400, Paul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > I don't think there really is any rocket science or contentious stuff here. > > It is a sensible cleanup that adds organization and speeds up compiles. > > The RFC I'm hoping for is more about how/when we want to get this in tree. > > In future, when you're ripping into module.h, please CC the module > maintainer. It's not just a courtesy, it helps everyone avoid redundant > work. Sorry about that. I think I'd created the original module.h patch in the context of the thread that Ingo started, and it never crossed my mind at the time to run get_maintainer.pl on module.h itself. And that patch hasn't changed since. An oversight on my part. :( > > You may insert your own sarcastic comment about "rocket science" here. Yeah, fair enough -- remembering to CC maintainers isn't rocket science. I hope you'll accept that it was an honest oversight caused by circumstance and that it wasn't an intentional exclusion. > > As to the patch: it's marginal improvement, but it's neater and I'm > happy you're doing it. Thanks -- I'm glad at least the end result is OK with you. Paul. > > Thanks, > Rusty. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-arch" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
