Arnd, Here: http://lwn.net/Articles/457635/ you say: "If the device tree vision comes true, a single board will actually be able to use the same device tree binary on either one, independent of which CPU actually runs the kernel." In my case, the hexagon and the arm cores will perceive the same devices at different addresses; there are also devices attached to one core that aren't attached to the other. So either we have two DT's, one for each core, or we have one DT with subsections for each core. I haven't yet looked to see how the DT's are being designed, but I have this sneaking suspicion that the second alternative is not being pursued ... --linas -- Sent by an employee of the Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. The Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora Forum. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-arch" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
