Re: [PATCH 2.5/13] memblock: Use __meminit[data] instead of __init[data]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hello,

On Thu, Jul 14, 2011 at 02:00:51PM -0700, Yinghai Lu wrote:
> >  #ifdef ARCH_DISCARD_MEMBLOCK
> > -#define __init_memblock __init
> > -#define __initdata_memblock __initdata
> > +#define __init_memblock __meminit
> > +#define __initdata_memblock __meminitdata
> >  #else
> >  #define __init_memblock
> >  #define __initdata_memblock
> 
> that is not good. It will keep memblock.reserved related data and
> functions after boot.
> and those data/func are not used after slab is ready.

Yeah, if MEMORY_HOTPLUG is enabled.  It isn't too big area to begin
with and early_node_map[] and related code removal should offset it.
The problem is that refining different __init tags here is a bit
complex thanks to DISCARD_MEMBLOCK.  We end up having to deal with the
combination of DISCARD_MEMBLOCK and MEMORY_HOTPLUG.  I was hoping that
once we get memblock usage more consistent across different archs, we
could do away with DISCARD_MEMBLOCK.

Thank you.

-- 
tejun
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-arch" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel]     [Kernel Newbies]     [x86 Platform Driver]     [Netdev]     [Linux Wireless]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux Filesystems]     [Yosemite Discussion]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux