Re: [PATCH 13/13] memblock, x86: Replace memblock_x86_reserve/free_range() with generic ones

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hello,

On Thu, Jul 14, 2011 at 10:23 PM, H. Peter Anvin <hpa@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On 07/14/2011 01:20 PM, Tejun Heo wrote:
> Sorry I don't follow.  We display resources as [...] ranges, and in
> particular when there are those kinds of brackets they tend to be
> inclusive ranges.
>
> For the internal representation, of course, [ ) ranges or (base, length)
> are the only sensible options.

[ ) ranges: e820, init_memory_mapping, NUMA nodes, Zone PFN ranges, PM
nosave memory

[ ] ranges: MTRR, NODE_DATA, early_node_map, [mm]io ranges

Hmm... I was only looking at the early boot messages which didn't
include the io ranges.  It ultimately is a cosmetic issue so my
opinions aren't very strong but I think we can leave [mm]io ranges
alone and converge the rest into [ ) ranges sans the brackets?

Thanks.

-- 
tejun
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-arch" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel]     [Kernel Newbies]     [x86 Platform Driver]     [Netdev]     [Linux Wireless]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux Filesystems]     [Yosemite Discussion]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux