[PATCH [ver #2] 16/39] UAPI: Fix sigset_t ordering problem

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



There's an ordering problem around the definition of sigset_t: the definition
in the kernel-specific header is referred to in the user-specific header data
structures, at least for x86.  When compiling userspace, the user-specific
header provides an alternate version of sigset_t.

To get around this problem, place a marker specifically to indicate the point
at which the #include_next should be placed in the kernel-specific file.

Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@xxxxxxxxxx>
---

 arch/x86/include/asm/signal.h |    2 ++
 1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/signal.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/signal.h
index 598457c..40ef827 100644
--- a/arch/x86/include/asm/signal.h
+++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/signal.h
@@ -40,6 +40,8 @@ typedef unsigned long sigset_t;
 #endif /* __KERNEL__ */
 #endif /* __ASSEMBLY__ */
 
+// DISINTEGRATE: INCLUDE UAPI HERE
+
 #define SIGHUP		 1
 #define SIGINT		 2
 #define SIGQUIT		 3

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-arch" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel]     [Kernel Newbies]     [x86 Platform Driver]     [Netdev]     [Linux Wireless]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux Filesystems]     [Yosemite Discussion]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux