Hi. On Mon, Jun 20, 2011 at 4:50 PM, Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > -extern int arm_dma_map_sg(struct device *, struct scatterlist *, int, > +extern int generic_dma_map_sg(struct device *, struct scatterlist *, int, > enum dma_data_direction, struct dma_attrs *attrs); > -extern void arm_dma_unmap_sg(struct device *, struct scatterlist *, int, > +extern void generic_dma_unmap_sg(struct device *, struct scatterlist *, int, > enum dma_data_direction, struct dma_attrs *attrs); > -extern void arm_dma_sync_sg_for_cpu(struct device *, struct scatterlist *, int, > +extern void generic_dma_sync_sg_for_cpu(struct device *, struct scatterlist *, int, > enum dma_data_direction); > -extern void arm_dma_sync_sg_for_device(struct device *, struct scatterlist *, int, > +extern void generic_dma_sync_sg_for_device(struct device *, struct scatterlist *, int, > enum dma_data_direction); > I don't understand why you changed arm_dma_*() with generic_dma_*() even though they're functionality is not changed and they are still specific to ARM. They look like that they are generic in the kernel code. Regards, Cho KyongHo. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-arch" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
