On Sat, 2011-05-28 at 23:24 +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > I just saw your git tree for the OpenRISC architecture port and it > looks really really nice, mostly by virtue of being very small, but > also by not copying all the things that new architecture ports normally > get wrong at the time when they show up on my radar. > Do you plan to submit it upstream any time soon? Yes, it's pretty much ready for submission. There are a couple of areas that I'm aware of that still need some work and there are some cleanups to do, but everything that faces userspace (ABI) has settled so it's stuff that could be done even after merging upstream. What would be the best approach to request review? I saw that the unicore32 architecture was posted in 'functional/subsystem' chunks... is that the best way to do it? Shall I do the same, or do you have a suggestion for a better way to do it? /Jonas
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
