Re: Writable sys_call_table (was: Re: [uClinux-dev] [PATCH] m68k: Merge mmu and non-mmu versions of sys_call_table)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, 19 Apr 2011, Andreas Schwab wrote:

> Finn Thain <fthain@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
> 
> > Wouldn't that require const void * const sys_call_table[] ?
> 
> No, the right signature would be void (*const sys_call_table[])(void)
> since this is an array of function pointers.

Right. I mis-parsed the definition as a pointer to an array... Sorry about 
the noise.

Finn


> 
> Andreas.
> 
> 
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-arch" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel]     [Kernel Newbies]     [x86 Platform Driver]     [Netdev]     [Linux Wireless]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux Filesystems]     [Yosemite Discussion]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux