about __BITS_PER_LONG

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi, Arnd:

  When using asm-generic/bitsperlong.h, I think that __BITS_PER_LONG could be the
same as BITS_PER_LONG if-not-defined. And this could avoid the duplicated macros
in almost all architectures.

Regards.

Guan Xuetao

---
diff --git a/include/asm-generic/bitsperlong.h b/include/asm-generic/bitsperlong.h
index 4ae54e0..31d032a 100644
--- a/include/asm-generic/bitsperlong.h
+++ b/include/asm-generic/bitsperlong.h
@@ -9,7 +9,11 @@
  * to decide it, but rather check a compiler provided macro.
  */
 #ifndef __BITS_PER_LONG
-#define __BITS_PER_LONG 32
+#   ifdef CONFIG_64BIT
+#	define __BITS_PER_LONG 64
+#   else
+#	define __BITS_PER_LONG 32
+#   endif /* CONFIG_64BIT */
 #endif
 
 #ifdef __KERNEL__

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-arch" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel]     [Kernel Newbies]     [x86 Platform Driver]     [Netdev]     [Linux Wireless]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux Filesystems]     [Yosemite Discussion]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux