On Sat, Mar 05, 2011 at 10:02:33PM +0100, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote: > On Wed, Jan 19, 2011 at 22:49, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > No functional change. > > > > Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > Cc: David Howells <dhowells@xxxxxxxxxx> > > --- > > arch/mn10300/Kconfig | 5 +---- > > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 4 deletions(-) > > > > Index: linux-2.6/arch/mn10300/Kconfig > > =================================================================== > > --- linux-2.6.orig/arch/mn10300/Kconfig > > +++ linux-2.6/arch/mn10300/Kconfig > > @@ -1,6 +1,7 @@ > > config MN10300 > > def_bool y > > select HAVE_OPROFILE > > + select GENERIC_HARDIRQS > > Wasn't this supposed to be "select HAVE_GENERIC_HARDIRQS"? > > /me studying generic hardirqs... One could hope this was nicely documented in kernel/irq/Kconfig. But that file contains only 9 lines of comments for 10 config symbols. Maybe it is just me but I was struggeling understanding the purpose of these config symbols. I found the individual bits of genirq nicely documented in most cases. But the overall picture was/is hard to get. And I never got enough understanding to write up something myself :-( Sam -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-arch" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
