Re: [PATCH 00/25] mm: Preemptibility -v7

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@xxxxxxxxx> writes:

> This patch-set makes part of the mm a lot more preemptible. It converts
> i_mmap_lock and anon_vma->lock to mutexes and makes mmu_gather fully
> preemptible.
>
> The main motivation was making mm_take_all_locks() preemptible, since it
> appears people are nesting hundreds of spinlocks there.

Just curious: why is mm_take_all_locks() a problem? As far as I can see
it's just used when starting KVM or GRU the first time. Is that a common
situation?

-Andi

-- 
Andi Kleen
Intel Open Source Technology Center

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-arch" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel]     [Kernel Newbies]     [x86 Platform Driver]     [Netdev]     [Linux Wireless]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux Filesystems]     [Yosemite Discussion]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux