Le mercredi 19 janvier 2011 Ã 12:44 -0800, Andrew Morton a Ãcrit : > On Wed, 19 Jan 2011 21:21:55 +0100 > Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > Le mercredi 19 janvier 2011 __ 12:17 -0800, Andi Kleen a __crit : > > > > > > > > I wont discuss about a function _name_ Andrew. > > > > > > > > If nobody can chose one better than the one I chosed, what can I do ? > > > > > > kthread_create_node() would seem logical (with a node parameter) > > > > > > -Andi > > > > I already explained why I dont like this suggestion. > > > > 1) My plan was to later add cpu affinity. > > That would be called kthread_create_on_cpu() except whoops, this patch > already took that. > I surrender :) I'll send a patch, or do you prefer I respin the 4 patches ? > > 2) All users I converted want to create one kthread per cpu, not per > > node. > > kswapd is a potential user. It would want one kthread per node. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-arch" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
