On Fri, 2011-01-14 at 09:50 -0800, Luck, Tony wrote: > Didn't Andrew make some rash promise at kernel summit about stopping > eating if "-mm" wasn't included in linux-next by the end of November? > > Must be getting pretty hungry by now. > > The transparent huge page code just arrived in the merge window > without having been in linux-next. I see this error when trying > to build for ia64 from Linus' tree this morning: This is insane. Having such a massively invasive change to the whole mm, barely tested on most architecture, and last I heard still generally controversial being merged like that without even some integration testing via -next makes no sense. Linus, wtf is going on ? Ben. > In file included from /home/aegl/generic-smp/arch/ia64/include/asm/pgtable.h:611, > from include/linux/mm.h:41, > from /home/aegl/generic-smp/arch/ia64/include/asm/uaccess.h:39, > from include/linux/poll.h:14, > from include/linux/rtc.h:117, > from include/linux/efi.h:19, > from /home/aegl/generic-smp/arch/ia64/include/asm/sal.h:40, > from /home/aegl/generic-smp/arch/ia64/include/asm/mca.h:20, > from arch/ia64/kernel/asm-offsets.c:17: > include/asm-generic/pgtable.h: In function âpmdp_get_and_clearâ: > include/asm-generic/pgtable.h:96: error: implicit declaration of function â__pmdâ > include/asm-generic/pgtable.h:96: error: incompatible types in return > make[1]: *** [arch/ia64/kernel/asm-offsets.s] Error 1 > > > Looks like arch/*/include/pgtable.h needs to define __pmd() but only x86 > was blessed with it. > > -Tony > -- > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in > the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html > Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-arch" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
