Re: PAGE_KERNEL_RO

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Jan 13 Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote at linux-arch:
> On Wed, 2011-01-12 at 16:07 -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > drivers/firewire/ohci.c now needs PAGE_KERNEL_RO, but many
> > architectures don't implement it.  Broke my sparc64 build.
> 
> Some architectures actually cannot implement it even... at least some
> variants of powerpc MMUs don't have a combination of protection bits
> that allow a kernel-only RO mapping (yeah odd).

The simplest perceivable fix, to disable firewire-ohci on architectures
which don't have PAGE_KERNEL_RO, would be bad since there are actually
sparc64 machines with these controllers.

As far as I can tell, the new RO mapping in firewire-ohci can as well be
an r/w mapping.  We just never need to write at these virtual addresses.
So, should we just change the driver to map it r/w when we can't have
PAGE_KERNEL_RO, or for simplicity on all architectures?
-- 
Stefan Richter
-=====-==-== ---= -==-=
http://arcgraph.de/sr/
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-arch" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel]     [Kernel Newbies]     [x86 Platform Driver]     [Netdev]     [Linux Wireless]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux Filesystems]     [Yosemite Discussion]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux