On 06.10.10 09:30:41, Paul Mundt wrote: > On Wed, Oct 06, 2010 at 03:18:25PM +0200, Robert Richter wrote: > > So, I am also fine with implementing a generic perf_pmu_name() for sh > > and then derive the oprofile cpu_type string from it in the oprofile > > code. > > > Again, this is unacceptable. Paul, maybe I misunderstood you, but isn't this you preferred solution? We make perf_pmu_name() part of the generic i/f and then derive the oprofile name from the pmu name provided by perf. -Robert -- Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. Operating System Research Center -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-arch" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
