On Wed, Oct 06, 2010 at 04:59:03PM +0200, Robert Richter wrote: > On 06.10.10 10:53:11, Paul Mundt wrote: > > On Wed, Oct 06, 2010 at 04:49:21PM +0200, Robert Richter wrote: > > > On 06.10.10 15:33:09, Robert Richter wrote: > > > > On 04.10.10 16:44:22, Matt Fleming wrote: > > > > > -void __exit oprofile_arch_exit(void) > > > > > +int __init oprofile_arch_init(struct oprofile_operations *ops) > > > > > +{ > > > > > > > > We should do here a: > > > > > > > > memset(ops, 0, sizeof(*ops)); > > > > > > Matt, > > > > > > an alternative would be to move this to oprofile_perf_init() and > > > modify ops->backtrace afterwards, but then we will lose the function's > > > tail call. Not sure that is better. Paul, what do you think? > > > > > I'm a bit confused as to why we just don't do: > > > > --- > > > > diff --git a/drivers/oprofile/oprof.c b/drivers/oprofile/oprof.c > > index b336cd9..76d97a5 100644 > > --- a/drivers/oprofile/oprof.c > > +++ b/drivers/oprofile/oprof.c > > @@ -252,6 +252,8 @@ static int __init oprofile_init(void) > > { > > int err; > > > > + memset(&oprofile_ops, 0, sizeof(struct oprofile_operations)); > > + > > Yes, this looks much better. Thanks Paul. > > In which case, if you want to take it: Signed-off-by: Paul Mundt <lethal@xxxxxxxxxxxx> -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-arch" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html