On Thu, Sep 16, 2010 at 04:32:54PM +0200, Robert Richter wrote:
> > diff --git a/arch/sh/kernel/perf_event.c b/arch/sh/kernel/perf_event.c
> > index 2cb9ad5..3c3fc9a 100644
> > --- a/arch/sh/kernel/perf_event.c
> > +++ b/arch/sh/kernel/perf_event.c
> > @@ -59,6 +59,14 @@ static inline int sh_pmu_initialized(void)
> > return !!sh_pmu;
> > }
> >
> > +const char *sh_pmu_name(void)
> > +{
> > + if (!sh_pmu)
> > + return NULL;
> > +
> > + return sh_pmu->name;
> > +}
>
> Couldn't we make this a generic function like perf_num_counters()?
Well, ARM doesn't have names as strings for its pmus currently. What's
more, ARM wouldn't use it; SH would be the only user of this function. I
don't think this one makes sense to be a generic function.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-arch" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
