Re: memory barrier question

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, Sep 21, 2010 at 07:59:10AM -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 20, 2010 at 01:40:55PM -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> > On Tue, Sep 21, 2010 at 08:26:14AM +1200, Michael Cree wrote:
> > > On 21/09/10 06:25, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> > > >But do we really care about Alpha anymore?  (I can see it now... The
> > > >Alpha portion of the kernel tree moves to staging...)
> > > 
> > > I do.
> > > 
> > > Sent from my Compaq Alpha XP1000 :-)
> > 
> > In that case, an smp_read_barrier_depends() or rcu_dereference() is
> > also required...
> 
> Wait a minute...  I finally got a chance to look up the system.  This
> system has only a single Alpha CPU, right?
> 
> If so, just build a UP kernel and be happy.  No need to worry about
> any of these SMP issues.
> 
> So, an alternative proposal -- support only UP kernels on Alpha.  ;-)

And there do seem to be some SMP Alpha systems still in use:

	http://www.alphalinux.org/wiki/index.php/User:Armin76/HW_list

							Thanx, Paul
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-arch" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel]     [Kernel Newbies]     [x86 Platform Driver]     [Netdev]     [Linux Wireless]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux Filesystems]     [Yosemite Discussion]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux