Re: Proposal: (u)intptr_t replaces (unsigned) long as opaque type

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sun, Sep 19, 2010 at 01:42, Greg McGary <greg@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> ÂI am porting Linux to a new architecture (a massively multi-threaded
> network processor), which has a unique and bothersome characteristic: sizeof
> (void*) > sizeof (long). ÂIn most regards, it is a 32-bit machine, but
> pointers and all GPRs are 48 bit. ÂPointers occupy 64 bits in memory, with
> 16 bits ignored by load/store.

Forgive my ignorence, but is there something fundamentally wrong with
having 48-bit longs?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-arch" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel]     [Kernel Newbies]     [x86 Platform Driver]     [Netdev]     [Linux Wireless]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux Filesystems]     [Yosemite Discussion]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux