Re: [PATCH 18/22] Fix M68K irqflags

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, Aug 30, 2010 at 22:50, David Howells <dhowells@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Greg Ungerer <gerg@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>> I have no problem with the changes as such. But I would rather
>> not have separate mm and no headers if we can avoid it.
>
> Well, I can roll the headers into one, but then it'll be much more #ifdef'd if
> you're okay with that.  The IRQ handling seems sufficiently different to
> warrant that.

Indeed, m68k doesn't use generic hardirqs yet, m68knommu does.

Gr{oetje,eeting}s,

                        Geert

--
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx

In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
                                -- Linus Torvalds
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-arch" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel]     [Kernel Newbies]     [x86 Platform Driver]     [Netdev]     [Linux Wireless]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux Filesystems]     [Yosemite Discussion]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux